Other voices, other minds

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (2):213-222 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Solipsism can be refuted along fairly traditional, internalist lines, by means of a second-order induction. We are justified in believing in other minds, because other people tell us that they have minds, and we have good inductive reason to believe that whatever certain others say is likely to be true. This simple argument is sound, the author argues, even though we are in no prior position to believe that other thinking people exist as such, or that the sounds they make have any meaning. The mere phenomenal surfaces of others' statements form sufficient grounds for the induction that the argument requires

Author's Profile

Ted Everett
State University of New York at Geneseo

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
275 (#55,205)

6 months
46 (#78,968)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?