Inferential Abilities and Common Epistemic Goods

Naturalizing Epistemic Virtue (CUP) (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While the situationist challenge has been prominent in philosophical literature in ethics for over a decade, only recently has it been extended to virtue epistemology . Alfano argues that virtue epistemology is shown to be empirically inadequate in light of a wide range of results in social psychology, essentially succumbing to the same argument as virtue ethics. We argue that this meeting of the twain between virtue epistemology and social psychology in no way signals the end of virtue epistemology, but is rather a boon to naturalized virtue epistemology. We use Gird Gigerenzer’s models for bounded rationality (2011) to present a persuasive line of defense for virtue epistemology, and consider prospects for a naturalized virtue epistemology that is supported by current research in psychology.

Author Profiles

Abrol Fairweather
University of San Francisco
Carlos Montemayor
San Francisco State University

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-18

Downloads
788 (#18,739)

6 months
80 (#58,671)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?