Material cause and syllogistic necessity in posterior analytics II 11

Manuscrito 42 (4):282-322 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The paper examines Posterior Analytics II 11, 94a20-36 and makes three points. (1) The confusing formula ‘given what things, is it necessary for this to be’ [τίνων ὄντων ἀνάγκη τοῦτ᾿ εἶναι] at a21-22 introduces material cause, not syllogistic necessity. (2) When biological material necessitation is the only causal factor, Aristotle is reluctant to formalize it in syllogistic terms, and this helps to explain why, in II 11, he turns to geometry in order to illustrate a kind of material cause that can be expressed as the middle term of an explanatory syllogism. (3) If geometrical proof is viewed as a complex construction built on simpler constructions, it can in effect be described as a case of purely material constitution.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FAIMCA
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-11-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Aristóteles, Física I-II.Lucas Angioni - 2009 - Editora da Unicamp.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-11-21

Total views
19 ( #43,598 of 44,471 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #32,680 of 44,471 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.