Citizenship for children: By soil, by blood, or by paternalism?

Philosophical Studies 175 (11):2859-2877 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Do states have a right to exclude prospective immigrants as they see fit? According to statists the answer is a qualified yes. For these authors, self-determining political communities have a prima facie right to exclude, which can be overridden by the claims of vulnerable groups such as refugees and children born in the state’s territory. However, there is a concern in the literature that statists have not yet developed a theory that can protect children born in the territory from being excluded from the political community. For if the self-determining political community has the right to decide who should form the self in the first place, then that right should count against both newcomers by immigration and newcomers by birth. Or so the concern goes. In this essay, I defend statism against this line of criticism and provide a liberal justification for the inclusion of children born within the state’s borders. My account leads to some surprising implication for citizenship law, as well as immigration arrangements in the area of asylum and unauthorized immigration.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-09-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Immigration: The Case for Limits.David Miller - 2005 - In Andrew I. Cohen & Christopher Heath Wellman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 193-206.
Immigration and Freedom of Association.Wellman, Christopher Heath

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
198 ( #13,445 of 38,046 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
87 ( #4,012 of 38,046 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.