Brentano and J. Stuart Mill on phenomenalism and mental monism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This study is about Brentano’s criticism of a version of phenomenalism that he calls “mental monism” and that he attributes to positivists philosophers such as Ernst Mach and John Stuart Mill. I am interested in Brentano’s criticism of Stuart Mill’s version of mental monism based on the idea of “permanent possibilities of sensation”. Brentano claims that this form of monism is characterized by the identification of the class of physical phenomena to that of mental phenomena and it commits itself to a form of idealism. Brentano argues instead for a form of indirect or hypothetical realism based on intentional correlations.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FISBAJ
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-11-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Reception of Ernst Mach in the School of Brentano.Denis Fisette - 2018 - Hungarian Philosophical Review 69 (4):34-49.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-11-10

Total views
96 ( #24,679 of 40,145 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
67 ( #7,175 of 40,145 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.