The possibilities of Incarnation: some radical Molinist suggestions

Religious Studies 37 (3):307-320 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The traditional doctrine of the Incarnation maintains that God became man. But was it necessary that God become the particular man He in fact became? Could some man or woman other than the man born in Bethlehem roughly two thousand years ago have been assumed by the Son to effect our salvation? This essay addresses such questions from the perspective of one embracing Molina's picture of divine providence. After showing how Molina thought his theory of middle knowledge helps alleviate a traditional Christological puzzle, the essay turns to the aforementioned questions concerning God's incarnational alternatives and suggests some fairly radical answers. Finally, the essay presents two substantial objections to these radical answers and argues that these objections fail.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FLITPO-7
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-07-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
181 ( #26,185 of 54,677 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #36,267 of 54,677 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.