Asymmetrism and the Magnitudes of Welfare Benefits

Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 15 (2):175-185 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One vexing question for Desire Satisfactionism is this: At what time do you benefit from a satisfied desire? Recently Eden Lin has proposed an intriguing answer. On this proposal – Asymmetrism – when past-directed desires are satisfied, the time interval during which you benefit is the time of the desire; and, when future-directed desires are satisfied, the time interval during which you benefit is the time of the object. In this essay, I argue that Asymmetrism forces us to give implausible answers to a different question: To what extent does a given satisfied desire benefit you?

Author's Profile

Andrew T. Forcehimes
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-22

Downloads
234 (#61,903)

6 months
85 (#46,376)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?