A Compatibility Law and the Classification of Theory Change

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The current formulation of the zeroth law (the law of compatibility) is marred with a number of theoretical problems, which necessitate its reformulation. In this paper, we propose that compatibility is an independent stance that can be taken towards epistemic elements of all types. We then provide a new definition of compatibility criteria to reflect this change. We show that the content of the zeroth law is deducible from our definition of compatibility. Instead of a static law of compatibility, we propose a new dynamic law of compatibility that explains how the stance of compatibility obtains. Unlike the zeroth law, this new law has empirical content, as it forbids certain conceivable scenarios. Having established these notions, we propose a classification space that exhaustively covers all the possible states a theory may occupy and all the transitions it may undergo during its lifecycle.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FRAACL-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-12-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Scientificity and The Law of Theory Demarcation.Ameer Sarwar & Patrick Fraser - 2018 - Scientonomy: Journal for the Science of Science 2:55-66.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-12-21

Total views
40 ( #44,544 of 50,282 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #21,371 of 50,282 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.