Fictive Utterance and Imagining II

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The currently standard approach to fiction is to define it in terms of imagination. I have argued elsewhere (Friend 2008) that no conception of imagining is sufficient to distinguish a response appropriate to fiction as opposed to non-fiction. In her contribution Kathleen Stock seeks to refute this objection by providing a more sophisticated account of the kind of propositional imagining prescribed by so-called ‘fictive utterances’. I argue that although Stock's proposal improves on other theories, it too fails to provide an adequate criterion of fictionality. I conclude by sketching an alternative account according to which fiction is a genre
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-12-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Nature of Fiction.Currie, Gregory

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total downloads
328 ( #7,581 of 37,122 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #15,702 of 37,122 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.