Meaning, Understanding and Normativity

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I defend the normativity of meaning against recent objections by arguing for a new interpretation of the ‘ought’ relevant to meaning. Both critics and defenders of the normativity thesis have understood statements about how an expression ought to be used as either prescriptive (indicating that speakers have reason to use the expression in a certain way) or semantic (designating certain uses as correct in a sense explicable in terms of truth). I propose an alternative view of the ‘ought’ as conveying the primitively normative attitudes speakers must adopt towards their uses if they are to use the expression with understanding
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-07-27
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Truth.Horwich, Paul
Meaning.Horwich, Paul
Meaning.Grice, H. Paul
Against Content Normativity.Glüer, Kathrin & Wikforss, Åsa

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
792 ( #2,105 of 37,288 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #15,305 of 37,288 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.