Nozick, prohibition, and no-fault motor insurance

Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2):201–208 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is a Nozickian theory of rights compatible with a no-fault motor insurance scheme? I say, Yes. The argument turns on an explication of the basis on which a Nozickian justifies the prohibition of merely risky activities.

Author's Profile

Toby Handfield
Monash University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
614 (#24,905)

6 months
160 (#18,109)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?