Rational Choice and the Transitivity of Betterness

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
If A is better than B and B is better than C, then A is better than C, right? Larry Temkin and Stuart Rachels say: No! Betterness is nontransitive, they claim. In this paper, I discuss the central type of argument advanced by Temkin and Rachels for this radical idea, and argue that, given this view very likely has sceptical implications for practical reason, we would do well to identify alternative responses. I propose one such response, which employs the idea that rational agents might regard some options as incommensurate in value, and will reasonably employ a heuristic of status quo maintenance to avoid suboptimal choices from incommensurate goods
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HANRCA-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-09-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Normativity.Thomson, Judith Jarvis

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-04-20

Total downloads
401 ( #5,856 of 37,187 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #20,940 of 37,187 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.