The Priority of Epistemology in Early Neo-Kantianism

History of Philosophy Quarterly 32 (1):57-77 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This essay examines the argumentative context in which early Neo-Kantian philosophers defined and defended "epistemology." The paper defends Richard Rorty's claim that the priority of epistemology influenced how the history of modern philosophy was written but corrects his story by showing that epistemology was defended mainly via antifoundational arguments. The essay begins with a few programmatic arguments by Kuno Fischer and Eduard Zeller but focuses mainly on Otto Liebmann's Kant und die Epigonen. I argue that Liebmann completes the agenda of Fischer and Zeller by giving a detailed account of how a metaphysical system is impossible for anyone who begins with modest, Kantian epistemological principles.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-03-17
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
378 ( #15,738 of 2,433,036 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #35,222 of 2,433,036 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.