Assertion, Implicature, and Iterated Knowledge

Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 8 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The present paper argues that there is a knowledge norm for conversational implicature: one may conversationally implicate p only if one knows p. Linguistic data about the cancellation behavior of implicatures and the ways they are challenged and criticized by speakers is presented to support the thesis. The knowledge norm for implicature is then used to present a new consideration in favor of the KK thesis. It is argued that if implicature and assertion have knowledge norms, then assertion requires not only knowledge but iterated knowledge: knowing that you know that you know that... you know. Such a condition on permissible assertion is argued to be plausible only if the KK thesis is true.

Author's Profile

Eliran Haziza
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-12

Downloads
614 (#22,992)

6 months
158 (#16,044)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?