Epistemic Normativity as Performance Normativity

Theoria 82 (3):274–284 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Virtue epistemology maintains that epistemic normativity is a kind of performance normativity, according to which evaluating a belief is like evaluating a sport or musical performance. I examine this thesis through the objection that a belief cannot be evaluated as a performance because it is not a performance but a state. I argue that virtue epistemology can be defended on the grounds that we often evaluate a performance through evaluating the result of the performance. The upshot of my account is that when a belief is evaluated under performance normativity, what we evaluate is not belief, but cognitive performance. My account of virtue epistemology offers a simple explanation of why knowledge is more valuable than true belief
Reprint years
2016
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOENA
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-04-24
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-04-21

Total views
561 ( #11,458 of 65,579 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #31,111 of 65,579 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.