The Fundamental Interests of Citizens: A Response to Chung

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Hun Chung’s recent article “Rawls’s Self-Defeat: A Formal Analysis” argues that the selection of results equivalent to justice as fairness can be derived by utilitarianism. Chung argues that these results can be achieved through the use of Rawls’s constructed utility function from his work Justice as Fairness. Although Chung’s article is finely argued and presented in great detail, this paper will show that Chung made three mistakes in the fundamentals of his argument. First, Chung mistakes Rawls’s constructed utility function as actually utilitarian. Second, Chung confuses the motivations and the assumptions of those held by agents in the original position and those held by utilitarian agents. Last, Chung’s previous mistakes result in the incorrect conclusion that an equal distribution of resources will be selected by representative agents instead of the unequal distribution prescribed by the difference principle.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOLTFI-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-02-09
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-02-09

Total views
24 ( #49,250 of 51,737 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #34,287 of 51,737 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.