Parfit's final arguments in normative ethics

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper starts by juxtaposing the normative ethics in the final part of Parfit's final book, On What Matters, vol. 3, with the normative ethics in his earlier books, Reasons and Persons and On What Matters, vol. 1. The paper then addresses three questions. The first is, where does the reflective-equilibrium methodology that Parfit endorsed in the first volume of On What Matters lead? The second is, is the Act-involving Act Consequentialism that Parfit considers in the final volume of On What Matters as plausible as Rossian deontology? The third is, how is the new argument that Parfit puts forward for Rule Consequentialism supposed to work?
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-09-02
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
111 ( #44,870 of 65,551 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #30,979 of 65,551 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.