Theism, the Hypothesis of Indifference, and the Biological Role of Pain and Pleasure

Faith and Philosophy 11 (3):452-466 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Following Hume’s lead, Paul Draper argues that, given the biological role played by both pain and pleasure in goal-directed organic systems, the observed facts about pain and pleasure in the world are antecedently much more likely on the Hypothesis of Indifference than on theism. I examine one by one Draper’s arguments for this claim and show how they miss the mark.

Author's Profile

Daniel Howard-Snyder
Western Washington University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
632 (#23,901)

6 months
112 (#32,075)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?