Milne’s Argument for the Log‐Ratio Measure

Philosophy of Science 75 (4):413-420 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article shows that a slight variation of the argument in Milne 1996 yields the log‐likelihood ratio l rather than the log‐ratio measure r as “the one true measure of confirmation. ” *Received December 2006; revised December 2007. †To contact the author, please write to: Formal Epistemology Research Group, Zukunftskolleg and Department of Philosophy, University of Konstanz, P.O. Box X906, 78457 Konstanz, Germany; e‐mail: franz.huber@uni‐konstanz.de

Author's Profile

Franz Huber
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
414 (#37,175)

6 months
85 (#43,532)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?