Enhancement and Civic Virtue

Social Theory and Practice 40 (3):499-527 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Opponents of biomedical enhancement frequently adopt what Allen Buchanan has called the “Personal Goods Assumption.” On this assumption, the benefits of biomedical enhancement will accrue primarily to those individuals who undergo enhancements, not to wider society. Buchanan has argued that biomedical enhancements might in fact have substantial social benefits by increasing productivity. We outline another way in which enhancements might benefit wider society: by augmenting civic virtue and thus improving the functioning of our political communities. We thus directly confront critics of biomedical enhancement who argue that it will lead to a loss of social cohesion and a breakdown in political life

Author Profiles

Thomas Douglas
University of Oxford
William Jefferson
Oxford University (DPhil)
Guy Kahane
University of Oxford

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-23

Downloads
500 (#31,493)

6 months
95 (#39,889)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?