Conceptual Disagreement about Justice: Verbal, but Not Merely Verbal

Dialogue 58 (4):701-9 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I introduce the articles contained in this special issue, and I briefly explain some of the main arguments presented in my book 'A Conceptual Investigation of Justice'. A central claim in my book is that a verbal and yet also philosophically substantial disagreement over the word ‘justice’ lies at the heart of a number of issues in contemporary political philosophy. Over the course of introducing my book’s arguments and the commentaries in this issue, I also offer an account of what it means for a dispute to be verbal, but not merely verbal.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
JOHCDA-5
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-05-03
Latest version: 3 (2020-02-07)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-05-03

Total views
175 ( #31,336 of 2,438,899 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #18,604 of 2,438,899 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.