Phenomenal Contrast Arguments: What they Achieve

Mind and Language:1-18 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Phenomenal contrast arguments (PCAs) are normally employed as arguments showing that a certain mental feature contributes to (the phenomenal character of) experience, that certain contents are represented in experience and that kinds of sui generis phenomenologies such as cognitive phenomenology exist. In this paper we examine a neglected aspect of such arguments, i.e., the kind of mental episodes involved in them, and argue that this happens to be a crucial feature of the arguments. We use linguistic tools to determine the lexical aspect of verbs and verb phrases – the tests for a/telicity and for duration. We then suggest that all PCAs can show is the presence of a generic achievement-like phenomenology, especially in the cognitive domain, which contrasts with the role that PCAs are given in the literature.
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
JORPCA-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-02-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-02-13

Total views
167 ( #24,656 of 50,123 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #14,623 of 50,123 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.