The Main Problem with USC Libertarianism

Philosophical Studies 105 (2):107-127 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Libertarians like Robert Kane believe that indeterminism is necessaryfor free will. They think this in part because they hold both (1) thatmy being the ultimate cause of at least part of myself is necessary forfree will and (2) that indeterminism is necessary for this ``ultimateself-causation''. But seductive and intuitive as this ``USCLibertarianism'' may sound, it is untenable. In the end, nometaphysically coherent (not to mention empirically valid) conception ofultimate self-causation is available. So the basic intuition motivatingthe USC Libertarian is ultimately impossible to fulfill.

Author's Profile

Ken M. Levy
Louisiana State University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
388 (#41,968)

6 months
46 (#80,006)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?