Ethics of Vaccine Refusal

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Proponents of vaccine mandates typically claim that everyone who can be vaccinated has a moral or ethical obligation to do so for the sake of those who cannot be vaccinated, or in the interest of public health. I evaluate several previously undertheorised premises implicit to the ‘obligation to vaccinate’ type of arguments and show that the general conclusion is false: there is neither a moral obligation to vaccinate nor a sound ethical basis to mandate vaccination under any circumstances, even for hypothetical vaccines that are medically risk-free. Agent autonomy with respect to self-constitution has absolute normative priority over reduction or elimination of the associated risks to life. In practical terms, mandatory vaccination amounts to discrimination against healthy, innate biological characteristics, which goes against the established ethical norms and is also defeasible a priori.
Reprint years
2021
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KOWEOV-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-02-26
Latest version: 3 (2021-03-13)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-02-26

Total views
1,354 ( #3,261 of 65,622 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
929 ( #288 of 65,622 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.