Duty and the Beast: Should We Eat Meat in the Name of Animal Rights?

Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The moral status of animals is a subject of controversy both within and beyond academic philosophy, especially regarding the question of whether and when it is ethical to eat meat. A commitment to animal rights and related notions of animal protection is often thought to entail a plant-based diet, but recent philosophical work challenges this view by arguing that, even if animals warrant a high degree of moral standing, we are permitted - or even obliged - to eat meat. Andy Lamey provides critical analysis of past and present dialogues surrounding animal rights, discussing topics including plant agriculture, animal cognition, and in vitro meat. He documents the trend toward a new kind of omnivorism that justifies meat-eating within a framework of animal protection, and evaluates for the first time which forms of this new omnivorism can be ethically justified, providing crucial guidance for philosophers as well as researchers in culture and agriculture.
Reprint years
9781107160071   1107160073   9781316612880   1316612880
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-03-02
Latest version: 2 (2019-03-02)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
1,002 ( #6,062 of 72,589 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
102 ( #6,585 of 72,589 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.