Epistemic agency and the self-knowledge of reason: on the contemporary relevance of Kant’s method of faculty analysis

Synthese (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Each of Kant’s three Critiques offers an account of the nature of a mental faculty and arrives at this account by means of a procedure I call ‘faculty analysis’. Faculty analysis is often regarded as among the least defensible aspects of Kant’s position; as a consequence, philosophers seeking to inherit Kantian ideas tend to transpose them into a different methodological context. I argue that this is a mistake: in fact faculty analysis is a live option for philosophical inquiry today. My argument is as follows: Faculty analysis is a live option for certain kinds of philosophical theories if so-called “agentialist” views about the nature of belief are correct. There are good reasons for thinking that such views are correct. So faculty analysis should not be dismissed out of hand. Since the first premise in this argument bears a lot of weight, a large part of the paper is devoted to clarifying and defending it, in part by arguing that Kant himself holds a version of agentialism about belief.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-09-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge‐How and Cognitive Achievement.Carter, J. Adam & Pritchard, Duncan
Kant and the Capacity to Judge.Westphal, Kenneth R. & Longuenesse, Beatrice

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
97 ( #32,910 of 48,895 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #18,964 of 48,895 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.