Hate Speech in Public Discourse: A Pessimistic Defense of Counterspeech

Social Theory and Practice 43 (4):851-883 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Jeremy Waldron, among others, has forcefully argued that public hate speech assaults the dignity of its targets. Without denying this claim, I contend that it fails to establish that bans, rather than counterspeech, are the appropriate response. By articulating a more refined understanding of counterspeech, I suggest that counterspeech constitutes a better way of blocking hate speech’s dignitarian harm. In turn, I address two objections: according to the first, which draws on contemporary philosophy of language, counterspeech does not block enough hate speech; according to the second, counterspeech blocks too much speech. Although these objections should qualify our optimism regarding counterspeech, I demonstrate that each can be turned, with even greater force, against hate speech bans.
ISBN(s)
0037-802X
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEPHSI-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-11-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-11-11

Total views
807 ( #6,988 of 65,693 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
103 ( #6,264 of 65,693 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.