Hate Speech in Public Discourse: A Pessimistic Defense of Counterspeech

Social Theory and Practice 43 (4):851-883 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jeremy Waldron, among others, has forcefully argued that public hate speech assaults the dignity of its targets. Without denying this claim, I contend that it fails to establish that bans, rather than counterspeech, are the appropriate response. By articulating a more refined understanding of counterspeech, I suggest that counterspeech constitutes a better way of blocking hate speech’s dignitarian harm. In turn, I address two objections: according to the first, which draws on contemporary philosophy of language, counterspeech does not block enough hate speech; according to the second, counterspeech blocks too much speech. Although these objections should qualify our optimism regarding counterspeech, I demonstrate that each can be turned, with even greater force, against hate speech bans.

Author's Profile

Maxime C. Lepoutre
University of Reading

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-11

Downloads
1,186 (#9,003)

6 months
160 (#15,894)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?