Epistemic Injustice in Research Evaluation: A Cultural Analysis of the Humanities and Physics in Estonia

Studia Philosophica Estonica 5 (2):108-132 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the issue of epistemic injustice in research evaluation. Through an analysis of the disciplinary cultures of physics and humanities, we attempt to identify some aims and values specific to the disciplinary areas. We suggest that credibility is at stake when the cultural values and goals of a discipline contradict those presupposed by official evaluation standards. Disciplines that are better aligned with the epistemic assumptions of evaluation standards appear to produce more "scientific" findings. To restore epistemic justice in research evaluation, we argue that the specificity of a discipline's epistemic aims, values, and cultural identities must be taken into account

Author Profiles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-19

Downloads
361 (#52,418)

6 months
102 (#50,904)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?