Idolatry, Indifference, and the Scientific Study of Religion: Two New Humean Arguments

Religious Studies:1-21 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We utilize contemporary cognitive and social science of religion to defend a controversial thesis: the human cognitive apparatus gratuitously inclines humans to religious activity oriented around entities other than the God of classical theism. Using this thesis, we update and defend two arguments drawn from David Hume: (i) the argument from idolatry, which argues that the God of classical theism does not exist, and (ii) the argument from indifference, which argues that if the God of classical theism exists, God is indifferent to our religious activity.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LINIIA-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-10-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
On the Unimportance of Theistic Belief.Megill, Jason & Linford, Dan

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-10-17

Total views
323 ( #11,908 of 45,274 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
65 ( #10,841 of 45,274 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.