Idolatry, Indifference, and the Scientific Study of Religion: Two New Humean Arguments

Religious Studies:1-21 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
We utilize contemporary cognitive and social science of religion to defend a controversial thesis: the human cognitive apparatus gratuitously inclines humans to religious activity oriented around entities other than the God of classical theism. Using this thesis, we update and defend two arguments drawn from David Hume: (i) the argument from idolatry, which argues that the God of classical theism does not exist, and (ii) the argument from indifference, which argues that if the God of classical theism exists, God is indifferent to our religious activity.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-10-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
On the Unimportance of Theistic Belief.Megill, Jason L. & Linford, Daniel

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
392 ( #11,148 of 50,231 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
71 ( #7,525 of 50,231 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.