Vagueness and Modality

Philosophical Perspectives 30 (1):1-39 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
How does vagueness interact with metaphysical modality and with restrictions of it, such as nomological modality? In particular, how do definiteness, necessity (understood as restricted in some way or not), and actuality interact? This paper proposes a model-theoretic framework for investigating the logic and semantics of that interaction. The framework is put forward in an ecumenical spirit: it is intended to be applicable to all theories of vagueness that express vagueness using a definiteness (or: determinacy) operator. We will show how epistemicists, supervaluationists, and theorists of metaphysical vagueness like Barnes and Williams (2010) can interpret the framework.  We will also present a complete axiomatization of the logic we recommend to both epistemicists and local supervaluationists. 
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LITVAM
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-10-19
Latest version: 4 (2017-04-16)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-10-19

Total views
222 ( #12,070 of 37,984 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #15,433 of 37,984 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.