Molyneux’s Question in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I propose a reading of Berkeley's Essay towards a New Theory of Vision in which Molyneux-type questions are interpreted as thought experiments instead of arguments. First, I present the general argumentative strategy in the NTV, and provide grounds for the traditional reading. Second, I consider some roles of thought experiments, and classify Molyneux-type questions in the NTV as constructive conjectural thought experiments. Third, I argue that (i) there is no distinction between Weak and Strong Heterogeneity theses in the NTV; (ii) that Strong Heterogeneity is the basis of Berkeley's theory; and (iii) that Molyneux-type questions act as illustrations of Strong Heterogeneity.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LOAMQI
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-05-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Thought Experiments.Sorensen, Roy A.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-06-15

Total views
41 ( #43,423 of 49,046 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #42,526 of 49,046 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.