On Having Evidence: A Reply to Neta

Logos and Episteme 6 (3): 367-370 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to one line of thought only propositions can be part of one’s evidence, since only propositions can serve the central functions of our ordinary concept of evidence. Ram Neta has challenged this argument. In this paper I respond to Neta’s challenge.

Author's Profile

Artūrs Logins
Université Laval

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-30

Downloads
465 (#32,748)

6 months
93 (#38,471)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?