“Putting the linguistic method in its place”: Mackie’s distinction between conceptual and factual analysis

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Early in his career and in critical engagement with ordinary language philosophy, John Mackie developed the roots of a methodology that would be fundamental to his thinking: Mackie argues that we need to clearly separate the conceptual analysis which determines the meaning of an ordinary term and the factual analysis which is concerned with the question what, if anything, our language corresponds to in the world. I discuss how Mackie came to develop this distinction and how central ideas of his philosophy are based on it. Using the examples of Mackie’s moral skepticism and his work on Locke’s theory of perception I show how his methodology opens the door to error theories but can also support more positive claims. Finally, I put Mackie’s methodology in a historical perspective and argue that in cases like the Gettier debate, we can use it to cast light on the vagueness of the underlying methodology in some philosophical debates.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LOSPTL
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-09-28
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Myth of Morality.Joyce, Richard

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-09-28

Total views
42 ( #37,646 of 43,961 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #17,519 of 43,961 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.