Testimonial Injustice and the Ideology Which Produces It

American Philosophical Quarterly 61 (3):215-231 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently, some scholars have argued that testimonial injustice may not only be due to prejudice toward the speaker, but also prejudice toward the content of what the speaker says. I argue that such accounts do not merely expand our picture of epistemic injustice, but give us reason to radically revise our approach to reducing testimonial injustice. The dominant conception of this project focuses on reducing speaker prejudice. But even if one were to successfully do so, the frequency of content prejudice means that one would still commit testimonial injustice in many of the same circumstances. I argue that we must reorient the project of reducing testimonial injustice toward critiquing the ideologies that produce it. I conclude with a sketch of what such a research program might look like.

Author's Profile

Dan Lowe
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-06-05

Downloads
2 (#95,451)

6 months
2 (#94,853)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?