NK≠HPC

Philosophical Quarterly 64 (256):471-477 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Homeostatic Property Cluster (HPC) account of natural kinds has become popular since it was proposed by Richard Boyd in the late 1980s. Although it is often taken as a defining natural kinds as such, it is easy enough to see that something's being a natural kind is neither necessary nor sufficient for its being an HPC. This paper argues that it is better not to understand HPCs as defining what it is to be a natural kind but instead as providing the ontological realization of (some) natural kinds.

Author's Profile

P. D. Magnus
State University of New York, Albany

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-25

Downloads
329 (#46,231)

6 months
55 (#67,137)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?