Could a machine think? Alan M. Turing vs. John R. Searle

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
“Could a machine think?” asks John R. Searle in his paper Minds, Brains, and Programs. He answers that “only a machine could think1, and only very special kinds of machines, namely brains.”2 The subject of this paper is the analysis of the aforementioned question through presentation of the symbol manipulation approach to intelligence and Searle's well-known criticism to this approach, namely the Chinese room argument. The examination of these issues leads to the systems reply of the Chinese room argument and tries to illustrate that Searle's response to the systems reply does not detract from the symbol manipulation approach.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2012-02-02
Latest version: 1 (2012-02-02)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
6,468 ( #246 of 2,427,832 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
806 ( #314 of 2,427,832 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.