Could a machine think? Alan M. Turing vs. John R. Searle

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
“Could a machine think?” asks John R. Searle in his paper Minds, Brains, and Programs. He answers that “only a machine could think1, and only very special kinds of machines, namely brains.”2 The subject of this paper is the analysis of the aforementioned question through presentation of the symbol manipulation approach to intelligence and Searle's well-known criticism to this approach, namely the Chinese room argument. The examination of these issues leads to the systems reply of the Chinese room argument and tries to illustrate that Searle's response to the systems reply does not detract from the symbol manipulation approach.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MARCAM-4
Revision history
First archival date: 2012-02-02
Latest version: 1 (2012-02-02)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-02-02

Total views
2,837 ( #352 of 40,089 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1,287 ( #149 of 40,089 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.