Does Kant Demand Explanations for All Synthetic A Priori Claims?

Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (3):549-576 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kant's philosophy promises to explain various synthetic a priori claims. Yet, as several of his commentators have noted, it is hard to see how these explanations could work unless they themselves rested on unexplained synthetic a priori claims. Since Kant appears to demand explanations for all synthetic a priori claims, it would seem that his project fails on its own terms. I argue, however, that Kant holds that explanations are required only for synthetic a priori claims about (purportedly) experience-independent entities, and that his project rests on a rationalist method of reflection that justifies certain basic synthetic a priori claims.

Author's Profile

Colin Marshall
University of Washington

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-13

Downloads
3,149 (#1,983)

6 months
257 (#7,594)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?