Is there something like a ('raw') visual sensation?

Archivio Di Filosofia 83 (3):151-160 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Regarding Husserl’s analysis of perception, the validity of concepts like visual sensation and ‘raw’, viz. ‘unapprehended’ sensation has been questioned. In this paper I discuss the issue with two American interpreters of Husserlian phenomenology: William McKenna and Quentin Smith, who respectively defend and criticize Husserl’s account. My aim is to show that their attempts remain controversial. Moreover, I will mention a textual source in which Husserl indirectly justifies the existence of visual sensations.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MARITS-6
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-12-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Logische Untersuchungen.Husserl, Edmund (ed.)

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-05-09

Total views
136 ( #22,543 of 43,080 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #25,741 of 43,080 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.