Transcendental Arguments for Personal Identity in Kant’s Transcendental Deduction

Philo 14 (2):109-136 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of the principle aims of the B version of Kant’s transcendental deduction is to show how it is possible that the same “I think” can accompany all of my representations, which is a transcendental condition of the possibility of judgment. Contra interpreters such as A. Brook, I show that this “I think” is an a priori (reflected) self-consciousness; contra P. Keller, I show that this a priori self-consciousness is first and foremost a consciousness of one’s personal identity from a first person point of view.

Author's Profile

Jacqueline Mariña
Purdue University

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-12

Downloads
858 (#15,302)

6 months
119 (#28,201)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?