Down with Natural Selection? [Book Review]

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52 (1):134-140 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Biologists are increasingly reexamining the conceptual structure of evolutionary theory, which dates back to the so-called Modern Synthesis of the 1930s and 1940s. Calls for an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) cite a number of empir- ical and theoretical advances that need to be accounted for, including evolvability, evo- lutionary novelties, capacitors of phenotypic evolution, developmental plasticity, and phenotypic attractors. In Biological Emergences, however, Robert Reid outlines a theory of evolution in which natural selection plays no role or—worse—actually impedes evo- lution by what Reid calls “natural experimentation.” For Reid, biological complexity emerges because of intrinsic mechanisms that work in opposition to natural selection, a view that would reopen old questions of orthogenesis and Lamarckism.This review outlines why we do need an EES, but also why it is unlikely to take the shape that Reid advocates.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MASDWN
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-06-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Is Evolvability Evolvable?Pigliucci, Massimo

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total views
854 ( #3,638 of 48,822 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
66 ( #9,320 of 48,822 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.