A limited skeptical threat [Book Review]

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41:35-6 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Doris argues that our choices are heavily influenced by forces that we wouldn’t count as genuine reasons. This unsettling conclusion is motivated by a debunking argument so wide-ranging that it isn’t foisted upon us by the sciences. Doris sometimes seems to lower his ambitions when offering instead a skeptical hypothesis argument, but that conflicts with his aims in the book.

Author's Profile

Joshua May
University of Alabama, Birmingham

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-27

Downloads
524 (#29,749)

6 months
77 (#52,147)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?