Can Typicality Arguments Dissolve Cosmology’s Flatness Problem?

Philosophy of Science 84 (5):1239-1252 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Several physicists, among them Hawking, Page, Coule, and Carroll, have argued against the probabilistic intuitions underlying fine-tuning arguments in cosmology and instead propose that the canonical measure on the phase space of Friedman-Robertson-Walker space-times should be used to evaluate fine-tuning. They claim that flat space-times in this set are actually typical on this natural measure and that therefore the flatness problem is illusory. I argue that they misinterpret typicality in this phase space and, moreover, that no conclusion can be drawn at all about the flatness problem by using the canonical measure alone.

Author's Profile

C. D. McCoy
Yonsei University

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-15

Downloads
271 (#53,940)

6 months
71 (#53,787)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?