Response to Philip J. Senter on arguments for Behemoth as a dinosaur

Science and Christian Belief 37 (1):84-86 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Senter makes a convincing case against Behemoth being a dinosaur in Job 40. He also deals with arguments for Leviathan and where elsewhere theologians have sought to categorise dinosaurs in scripture. I argue that, from the perspective of philosophy of science, we cannot conceive of dinosaurs in scripture seriously and it is time to lay the debate to rest for reasons other than translation.

Author's Profile

Sam McKee
Manchester Metropolitan University

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-12

Downloads
30 (#105,302)

6 months
30 (#102,905)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?