Physicalism unfalsified: Chalmers' inconclusive argument for dualism

In Carl Gillett & Barry M. Loewer (eds.), Physicalism and its Discontents. Cambridge University Press. pp. 331-349 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper aims to show that David Chalmers' conceivability argument against physicalism, as presented in his 1996 book, The Conscious Mind, is inconclusive. The key point is that, while the argument seems to assume that someone competent with a given concept thereby has access to the primary intension of the concept, there are physicalist-friendly views of conceptual competence which imply that this assumption is not true.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MELPUC
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-04-03
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
12 ( #58,914 of 58,303 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #48,270 of 58,303 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.