Aporia and Conversion: A Critical Discussion of R. E. Allen's "Plato's Parmenides"

Review of Metaphysics 41 (2):355 - 368 (1987)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A appreciation and critical discussion of RE Allen's Plato's Parmenides. I argue that, contra Allen, the Parmenides is not an aporetic dialogue and that the eight hypotheses are not governed by the so-called "dilemma of participation." Rather, the apparent contradictions between and within the hypotheses function to elicit from the reader a distinction in kind between the sorts of one that forms, on the one hand, and their sensible participants, on the other, are and to illumine the 'relation' of participation.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2016-08-30
Latest version: 1 (2016-08-30)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
262 ( #22,546 of 2,432,580 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #40,288 of 2,432,580 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.