Cartografía filosófico-política del ciberespacio: posturas extremas y moderadas

Cuadernos Del Sur. Filosofía (43-44):207-228 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Information and communication technologies present new challenges for political theory and philosophy due to its large-scale and scope transformations. Their demands are reflected in institutional needs that cover a “cyber-political” space, i. e., a cluster of problems of the governance of the network of networks –Internet– that results in the formation of new institutions –e. g. ICANN. The question I try to answer here is: What characterizes cyberspace political discourses? The proposed hypothesis is that it is possible to interpret the varied cyber-political positions from their relation with the actors that dispute cyberspace regulation. Taking this relationship as an Archimedean point, I distinguish between extreme positions –cyber-conservatism and cyber-libertarianism– and moderate positions –cyber-liberalism and cyber- socialism. Through the investigation of the works of the main proponents of each position (Goldsmith, Wu, Barlow, Assange, Lessig, Barbrook and Filby) I try to show the modifications in the traditional political positions after the incorporation of the prefix “cyber” and also, to highlight the benefits of the moderate positions over the extreme ones.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2016-10-21
Latest version: 1 (2016-10-21)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
150 ( #34,698 of 2,439,374 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #50,891 of 2,439,374 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.