The Equivocal Use of Power in Nietzsche’s Failed Anti-Egalitarianism

Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (4):1-32 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper argues that Nietzsche’s anti-egalitarianism depends on equivocation between conceptions of power as quantitative superiority and qualitative feeling and between associated conceptions of equality as similarity and opposition or resistance . Nietzsche’s key arguments against equality fail when applied to the qualitative form of power, since the feeling of power does not directly correlate with quantitative ability and requires relatively equal or proportional resistance. Consequently, Nietzsche’s commitment to the promotion of humanity’s highest individuals does not entail the rejection of moral egalitarianism in every form and even supports a pluralistic egalitarianism that promotes equality understood not as similarity but as multiple, proportional resistances.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2012-01-02
Latest version: 3 (2015-10-21)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total downloads
113 ( #19,735 of 37,147 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #32,902 of 37,147 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.