How common standards can diminish collective intelligence: a computational study

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Making good decisions depends on having accurate information – quickly, and in a form in which it can be readily communicated and acted upon. Two features of medical practice can help: deliberation in groups and the use of scores and grades in evaluation. We study the contributions of these features using a multi-agent computer simulation of groups of physicians. One might expect individual differences in members’ grading standards to reduce the capacity of the group to discover the facts on which well-informed decisions depend. Observations of the simulated groups suggest on the contrary that this kind of diversity can in fact be conducive to epistemic performance. Sometimes, it is adopting common standards that may be expected to result in poor decisions.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MORHCS-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-07-12
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-07-12

Total views
309 ( #17,068 of 55,800 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #17,033 of 55,800 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.