How to reject a counterfactual

Logique Et Analyse 239:317-335 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Aaccording to D. K. lewis (1973), would-couterfactuals and might-counterfactuals are duals. from this, it follows that the negation of a would-counterfactual is equiv- alent to the corresponding “might-not”-counterfactual and that the negation of a might-counterfactual is equivalent to the corresponding “would-not”- counterfactual. there are cases, however, where we seem to be entitled to accept the would- counterfactual and we are also equally entitled to accept the corresponding might-not-counterfactual and cases where we seem to be entitled to accept the might-counterfactual without being equally entitled to reject the corresponding would-not-counterfactual. In this paper, I will show that a distinction between two types of rejections for counterfactuals (p-rejection and s-rejection) and the recognition that might-not-counterfactuals may play the role of p-rejections (by an application to counterfactuals of the lewisian approach to conversational scores) could explain why the problematic cases should not be seen as cases where the duality of would- and might-counterfactuals fails.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MORHTR-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-03-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Common Ground.Stalnaker, Robert
On Conditionals.Edgington, Dorothy

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-03-22

Total views
37 ( #38,489 of 43,762 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #26,507 of 43,762 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.